Comments 196

Re: "If I Didn't Have These Powerful Tools, I Wouldn't Do It at All" - The Oliver Twins Explain Why They're Dizzy About GenAI

RootsGenoa

"Now, as for scraping IP and all of that kind of stuff, which is the main question you had, I believe that there should be regulations about what AI is trained on. I, unfortunately, do not run OpenAI or any of these other big gigs. I believe there should be guardrails on what AI is allowed to do, what material is given for its training. If it goes to people who have IP that's valuable and is trained on it, then something needs to be sorted. They either need to be paid or not to be used on that."
LOL, they absolutely don't understand that if AI didn't steal work, it wouldn't be able to generate anything. That's the whole point of AI.

Re: "Nobody Is Obligated To Download Or Play It" - Mario Kart 64 And Minish Cap Get Native Dual-Screen 3DS Ports

RootsGenoa

@BlabberBun "You saying "we've been using these things a lot longer and it's harder to live without them" is a pretty poor argument, and is weak analogy at best. Just because something has been normalized doesn't mean you just shrug and go "oh well"."
That's absolutely not what I've written, though. I precisely said "and we need to improve A LOT in these areas as well". I'm just saying it's way easier to stop using AI now when we started only a few years ago, and some of us like me didn't even start using it.

Re: "Nobody Is Obligated To Download Or Play It" - Mario Kart 64 And Minish Cap Get Native Dual-Screen 3DS Ports

RootsGenoa

@BlabberBun The usual whataboutism. Yes, the Internet also uses too much energy, and clothing uses too much water, and we need to improve A LOT in these areas as well. However, we've been using the Internet and especially clothes for way longer than genAI, so it's way more difficult to live without them. It's crazy some people now claim they can't do anything without AI when they didn't use it at all a few years ago and were fine... They really sound like drug addicts if you ask me (but you won't).
Oh, and I'm also "railing against animal agriculture and war" btw, I just don't see the point to do it here, when it has nothing to do with the subject.

Re: Review: SuperStation One - This $210 FPGA PlayStation Puts Sony's PS Classic To Shame

RootsGenoa

@-wc- The idea is that you make a copy before, obviously, 'for archival purposes'. Anyway, the law wasn't designed to allow you to play your games on other systems as well. When you buy a game, you basically buy a license to play that game on a specific system. However it's clear lawmakers didn't know anything about emulation and FPGA. These laws were mostly designed to allow people to copy their personal data, nothing more. So they're obviously full of holes, and until there's a trial going on, there won't be any case-law about it unfortunately.

Re: Review: SuperStation One - This $210 FPGA PlayStation Puts Sony's PS Classic To Shame

RootsGenoa

@Soapy159 I got you the first time, while you apparently didn't read what I said in my last post, in which I replied TO YOU.

Sony would have never asked people to rip their own games for the PS Classic, so the PS Classic (or any official system, if you prefer that word to 'legal' was always at a disadvantage compared to a MISTer. Hence the unfair comparison.

(also, almost nobody will rip their own games when they can download them easily, and also, in the US law at least, you are only allowed to play a copy of a game you owned if the original game doesn't work anymore, so technically, it's still illegal - but nobody cares)