DropDash Which of Sega’s joysticks did you hop on to say those type of words. You must a riot as baseball games.
Wavey84
Bruh no you haven’t lived through it's entirety....the boy band craze wasn’t bad and cartoons didn’t go to *****, all of works along with fashion, music, commercials, sitcoms, none of that was bad. Face it. 1991 compared to 1999 was a Sega nightmare and then Nintendo came finally to save the day. living on a completely different planet. the former isn’t 1 million times better....Yes I can say 'the 90's' because all of those years within that decade ARE the same throughout...Those pop cultures aren’t that great. Nintendo did rule the world but Sega tried to challenge them and ruin it. The home interior/decor wasn’t that great and people werent more social and optomistic, they are a little bit more stressed and they were bombarded with all of the stuff these days....people could live in a bubble, they weren’t forced to go out and socialize to get what they needed. The world wasn’t full and didn’t brought forth imagination and color. The mid to late 2000's, was way better, and there were MANY great horror movies, and the Wii & DS are amazing. EVERYTHING holds a candle to living in 85-91, Sorry but your opinion and personal preference means jack when It comes to the 2000s which is still way better.
@DropDash Which of Sega’s joysticks did you hop on to say those type of words. You must a riot as baseball games.
@Wavey84
Bruh no you haven’t lived through it's entirety....the boy band craze wasn’t bad and cartoons didn’t go to *****, all of works along with fashion, music, commercials, sitcoms, none of that was bad. Face it. 1991 compared to 1999 was a Sega nightmare and then Nintendo came finally to save the day. living on a completely different planet. the former isn’t 1 million times better....Yes I can say 'the 90's' because all of those years within that decade ARE the same throughout...Those pop cultures aren’t that great. Nintendo did rule the world but Sega tried to challenge them and ruin it. The home interior/decor wasn’t that great and people werent more social and optomistic, they are a little bit more stressed and they were bombarded with all of the stuff these days....people could live in a bubble, they weren’t forced to go out and socialize to get what they needed. The world wasn’t full and didn’t brought forth imagination and color. The mid to late 2000's, was way better, and there were MANY great horror movies, and the Wii & DS are amazing. EVERYTHING holds a candle to living in 85-91, Sorry but your opinion and personal preference means jack when It comes to the 2000s which is still way better.
@Wavey84 You obviously don’t know a thing about the 90s. Also I was around these times and you havens seen quite the stuff I’ve seen. I would take 2000s, 2010s and 2020 over 90s no doubt. The mid to late 90s weren’t terrible times. The 90s weren’t always that great and it has flaws. Accept that. Face it.
@GreatPlayer Dude no The CPU of Genesis was NOT twice as fast. Also you are wrong theSNES could and has proven to make games like Sonic the Hedgehog technically. Factually the Genesis had inferior graphics. If you compare SNES Contra and Genesis Contra, SNES Contra was actually much faster in speed. If you compare SNES Alladin and the Genesis counterpart, SNES was like a game Disney movie. It wasnt a decision by Nintendo to boost up graphic chips and sound, in expense of CPU speed. It wasn’t to make SNES still affordable. The Genesis CPU was not faster in speed technically. Therefore, SNES was not and did not have to share resources for better graphics and sounds. Those components were not mostly handled by the corresponding chips. Nintendo chose a better CPU chip to make up for better and thus more expansive sound and graphic chips.
@YoshiTails Snes is way better tho, you got to play many of its gems.
@Damo No way dude the SNES could process more instructions and the CPU speed did not play a part. Compare a fast-paced shooter on the MD with one on the SNES and won’t see the difference. The SNES could chuck loads of sprites around with little slowdown and it didn’t struggle in this respect. Are you dense? The snes is NOT weak when it comes to shooters and it didn’t have any limits and it didn’t show how strong the genesis is. Stop lying.
@DarthNocturnal No it didn’t have other advantages so it is completely false.
@NTELLIGENTMAN No it didn’t dude. The snes mad ebetter games and it speed passed the competition.
@Action51 No dude. The console wars WERE bitter. Don’t even go there dude. They WERE that bitter...it was mostly all in horrible fasion. It WAS like today where console crusading is "serious business" and you DID have online forums where people practically make death threats over which consumer electronics gaming box is better. There was definitely schoolyard bragging...and it WAS a whole culture of fanboyism and hate. There were NO boundaries, and at the end of the day most people would NOT have liked to buy both consoles if they had the money to support it. 16 bit console wars existed mostly as Sega’s brainwashing commercials and Nintendo trying to snap people back to reality commercials that most of us looked at and repeated ironically.
@Socar No the ram on genesis is not faster than the SNES And this is not the part that SEGA dominated the most......I’m glad that SEGA is no more first party.....
Another benefit was that the snes graphics chip allowed quicker DMA transfer speeds and delivered more VRAM bandwidth than the tech inside sega’s console. Like the famous Mode 7 feature on the SNES.
@blackice85 Totally false, the famous console wars of the 90s were actually much more bloodier than what we see today. There is no biggest and that not due to the Internet, like seriously it's easy to be an anonymous jack-off and spout whatever you want with many repercussions in the 90s. Back in the real world, kids mostly had one system or the other, and it WAS like an act of betrayal if you had something different than your friends. And guess what? it was NOT cool to have access to a different library of games to play with them. It was a CONSOLE WAR, NOT CONSOLE PEACE.
@Gamemoose False. Nintendo DID respond with any kind dude. Nintendo did have some bitter stuff but Sega was a huge bully.
@WiiLovePeace Genesis sucks but Nintendon’t.
@patbacknitro17 SNES CPU is def more efficient than the M68000, its speed IS high enough to match the processor in the Genesis. There is no 8-bit data bus of the SNES. It’s 16 bit. That is another factor in the speed difference between the systems. Snes had better speed. Damo never had any points.
@sdelfin FALSE About the resolution and sprite sizes, the Snes stillhad the advantage. Despite what resolution was theoretically possible on the Genesis, the vast majority of snes games did not run at 256x224. And many Genesis games also run at 256x224, it was never common for games to be at 320x240. Also the SNES had support for larger sprites, the SNES was never restricted in terms of sizes available and how many different sizes could be used at one time. The Genesis was NOT more flexible in that it couldnt use any combination of any of its available sizes. What you have read is false. The snes advantages of sprites and resolution is still factual The biggest advantages of the SNES were the color palette, special effects and PCM audio I can agree on but the SNES audio system did NOT create any problems. Actually the genesis audio system created many problems. In hindsight, Nobody would have preferred a hybrid of FM synth with several PCM channels like many arcade boards. That’s just illogical. For the Genesis, its color palette limitations were NOT hard to downplay because many of its limitations were always and factually there and the most obvious problems. The genesis isn’t better, the snes is.
@Xenocity SNES was the first system to have a unified memory pool, while Genesis had split memory pool with each chip functioning on it's own. The Genesis CPU was NOT 2x faster than SNES CPU, and no Nintendo wanted a cheaper and better chip to use. The SNES CPU had more modes and capabilities built into it, allowing it to do plenty of 3D stuff that Genesis couldn't handle. SNES had the better sound chip too. Snes was able to the spec war and Sega marketing how their CPU was 2x more powerful than SNES CPU is false. And no Snes is known for actually being more powerful.
@Mr-X9000 Nah bruh there are def issues with blast processing.
@benjohn “CPU frequency only when the two CPUs in comparison have exactly the same architecture which is definitely the case here. SNES CPU has obvious advantages over Genesis regardless of the frequency.“ Fixed that for you.
@Wavey84 Hell no. Screw that era. People like him need to apologize for making that marketing gimmick happen. The 90s wasn’t all great. It had flaws. One of those flaws was Sega and their genesis., console designs these days are not boring. There are no Black, shiny, Ferrari-sophisticated serious business uuber sleek designs and many of these consoles have their own distinct sound either. That uniqueness of Nintendo is still there. Nintendo still reigns supreme.
@technotreegrass Nah bruh Outside of the marketing campaigns on TV, there WAS Nintendo/Sega console war stuff on the playground and it was brutal. Does matter if you owned a SNES or a Genesis, Snes had great games. Sega acknowledged it. Skip ahead to the N64/PS1 years...yeah...that's when crap got less brutal . I N64, N64 is a Men’s console." It ain’t a baby’s console.
@Wavey84 There was definitely real console wars on playgrounds during the NES/Master System generation and SNES/Genesis days....Nobody enjoyed both consoles.....The evil Sega empire was defeated by the heroic Nintendo kingdom.. I would too easily give the 16-bit crown to the SNES. The PS1/N64 generation? There was def a console wars, it wasn’t more prominent than the generation before it. It WAS until the gamecube generation when console wars got a little more serious. It's when Nintendo wrongly so got deemed 'kiddy' even though they aren’t kiddy.
@Audiobrainiac If you actually use that with no regrets you need help.
@Red-force Blast processing is a horrible marketing gimmick and sega era the not the most golden game ever. You don’t have experience.
@Splatburst There WAS a console war and it was NOT just a US thing.
Comments 8
Re: The Man Responsible For Sega's Blast Processing Gimmick Is Sorry For Creating "That Ghastly Phrase"
@WiiLovePeace Genesis sucks but Nintendon’t
Re: The Man Responsible For Sega's Blast Processing Gimmick Is Sorry For Creating "That Ghastly Phrase"
DropDash Which of Sega’s joysticks did you hop on to say those type of words. You must a riot as baseball games.
Wavey84
Bruh no you haven’t lived through it's entirety....the boy band craze wasn’t bad and cartoons didn’t go to *****, all of works along with fashion, music, commercials, sitcoms, none of that was bad. Face it. 1991 compared to 1999 was a Sega nightmare and then Nintendo came finally to save the day. living on a completely different planet. the former isn’t 1 million times better....Yes I can say 'the 90's' because all of those years within that decade ARE the same throughout...Those pop cultures aren’t that great.
Nintendo did rule the world but Sega tried to challenge them and ruin it. The home interior/decor wasn’t that great and people werent more social and optomistic, they are a little bit more stressed and they were bombarded with all of the stuff these days....people could live in a bubble, they weren’t forced to go out and socialize to get what they needed. The world wasn’t full and didn’t brought forth imagination and color.
The mid to late 2000's, was way better, and there were MANY great horror movies, and the Wii & DS are amazing. EVERYTHING holds a candle to living in 85-91, Sorry but your opinion and personal preference means jack when It comes to the 2000s which is still way better.
Re: The Man Responsible For Sega's Blast Processing Gimmick Is Sorry For Creating "That Ghastly Phrase"
@DropDash Which of Sega’s joysticks did you hop on to say those type of words. You must a riot as baseball games.
@Wavey84
Bruh no you haven’t lived through it's entirety....the boy band craze wasn’t bad and cartoons didn’t go to *****, all of works along with fashion, music, commercials, sitcoms, none of that was bad. Face it. 1991 compared to 1999 was a Sega nightmare and then Nintendo came finally to save the day. living on a completely different planet. the former isn’t 1 million times better....Yes I can say 'the 90's' because all of those years within that decade ARE the same throughout...Those pop cultures aren’t that great.
Nintendo did rule the world but Sega tried to challenge them and ruin it. The home interior/decor wasn’t that great and people werent more social and optomistic, they are a little bit more stressed and they were bombarded with all of the stuff these days....people could live in a bubble, they weren’t forced to go out and socialize to get what they needed. The world wasn’t full and didn’t brought forth imagination and color.
The mid to late 2000's, was way better, and there were MANY great horror movies, and the Wii & DS are amazing. EVERYTHING holds a candle to living in 85-91, Sorry but your opinion and personal preference means jack when It comes to the 2000s which is still way better.
Re: The Man Responsible For Sega's Blast Processing Gimmick Is Sorry For Creating "That Ghastly Phrase"
@Audiobrainiac Someone had to call out your overused high spiritness.
Re: The Man Responsible For Sega's Blast Processing Gimmick Is Sorry For Creating "That Ghastly Phrase"
@Wavey84 You obviously don’t know a thing about the 90s. Also I was around these times and you havens seen quite the stuff I’ve seen. I would take 2000s, 2010s and 2020 over 90s no doubt. The mid to late 90s weren’t terrible times. The 90s weren’t always that great and it has flaws. Accept that. Face it.
Re: The Man Responsible For Sega's Blast Processing Gimmick Is Sorry For Creating "That Ghastly Phrase"
@GreatPlayer Dude no The CPU of Genesis was NOT twice as fast. Also you are wrong theSNES could and has proven to make games like Sonic the Hedgehog technically. Factually the Genesis had inferior graphics. If you compare SNES Contra and Genesis Contra, SNES Contra was actually much faster in speed. If you compare SNES Alladin and the Genesis counterpart, SNES was like a game Disney movie. It wasnt a decision by Nintendo to boost up graphic chips and sound, in expense of CPU speed. It wasn’t to make SNES still affordable. The Genesis CPU was not faster in speed technically. Therefore, SNES was not and did not have to share resources for better graphics and sounds. Those components were not mostly handled by the corresponding chips. Nintendo chose a better CPU chip to make up for better and thus more expansive sound and graphic chips.
@YoshiTails Snes is way better tho, you got to play many of its gems.
@Damo No way dude the SNES could process more instructions and the CPU speed did not play a part. Compare a fast-paced shooter on the MD with one on the SNES and won’t see the difference. The SNES could chuck loads of sprites around with little slowdown and it didn’t struggle in this respect. Are you dense? The snes is NOT weak when it comes to shooters and it didn’t have any limits and it didn’t show how strong the genesis is. Stop lying.
@DarthNocturnal No it didn’t have other advantages so it is completely false.
@NTELLIGENTMAN No it didn’t dude. The snes mad ebetter games and it speed passed the competition.
@Action51 No dude. The console wars WERE bitter. Don’t even go there dude.
They WERE that bitter...it was mostly all in horrible fasion. It WAS like today where console crusading is "serious business" and you DID have online forums where people practically make death threats over which consumer electronics gaming box is better.
There was definitely schoolyard bragging...and it WAS a whole culture of fanboyism and hate. There were NO boundaries, and at the end of the day most people would NOT have liked to buy both consoles if they had the money to support it.
16 bit console wars existed mostly as Sega’s brainwashing commercials and Nintendo trying to snap people back to reality commercials that most of us looked at and repeated ironically.
@Socar No the ram on genesis is not faster than the SNES
And this is not the part that SEGA dominated the most......I’m glad that SEGA is no more first party.....
Another benefit was that the snes graphics chip allowed quicker DMA transfer speeds and delivered more VRAM bandwidth than the tech inside sega’s console. Like the famous Mode 7 feature on the SNES.
Re: The Man Responsible For Sega's Blast Processing Gimmick Is Sorry For Creating "That Ghastly Phrase"
@blackice85 Totally false, the famous console wars of the 90s were actually much more bloodier than what we see today. There is no biggest and that not due to the Internet, like seriously it's easy to be an anonymous jack-off and spout whatever you want with many repercussions in the 90s.
Back in the real world, kids mostly had one system or the other, and it WAS like an act of betrayal if you had something different than your friends. And guess what? it was NOT cool to have access to a different library of games to play with them. It was a CONSOLE WAR, NOT CONSOLE PEACE.
@Gamemoose False. Nintendo DID respond with any kind dude. Nintendo did have some bitter stuff but Sega was a huge bully.
@WiiLovePeace Genesis sucks but Nintendon’t.
@patbacknitro17 SNES CPU is def more efficient than the M68000, its speed IS high enough to match the processor in the Genesis. There is no 8-bit data bus of the SNES. It’s 16 bit. That is another factor in the speed difference between the systems. Snes had better speed. Damo never had any points.
@sdelfin FALSE About the resolution and sprite sizes, the Snes stillhad the advantage. Despite what resolution was theoretically possible on the Genesis, the vast majority of snes games did not run at 256x224. And many Genesis games also run at 256x224, it was never common for games to be at 320x240. Also the SNES had support for larger sprites, the SNES was never restricted in terms of sizes available and how many different sizes could be used at one time. The Genesis was NOT more flexible in that it couldnt use any combination of any of its available sizes. What you have read is false. The snes advantages of sprites and resolution is still factual
The biggest advantages of the SNES were the color palette, special effects and PCM audio I can agree on but the SNES audio system did NOT create any problems. Actually the genesis audio system created many problems. In hindsight, Nobody would have preferred a hybrid of FM synth with several PCM channels like many arcade boards. That’s just illogical. For the Genesis, its color palette limitations were NOT hard to downplay because many of its limitations were always and factually there and the most obvious problems. The genesis isn’t better, the snes is.
Re: The Man Responsible For Sega's Blast Processing Gimmick Is Sorry For Creating "That Ghastly Phrase"
@ZeldaToThePast Heck naw.
@Xenocity SNES was the first system to have a unified memory pool, while Genesis had split memory pool with each chip functioning on it's own.
The Genesis CPU was NOT 2x faster than SNES CPU, and no Nintendo wanted a cheaper and better chip to use.
The SNES CPU had more modes and capabilities built into it, allowing it to do plenty of 3D stuff that Genesis couldn't handle.
SNES had the better sound chip too.
Snes was able to the spec war and Sega marketing how their CPU was 2x more powerful than SNES CPU is false. And no Snes is known for actually being more powerful.
@Mr-X9000 Nah bruh there are def issues with blast processing.
@benjohn “CPU frequency only when the two CPUs in comparison have exactly the same architecture which is definitely the case here. SNES CPU has obvious advantages over Genesis regardless of the frequency.“ Fixed that for you.
@Wavey84 Hell no. Screw that era. People like him need to apologize for making that marketing gimmick happen. The 90s wasn’t all great. It had flaws. One of those flaws was Sega and their genesis., console designs these days are not boring. There are no Black, shiny, Ferrari-sophisticated serious business uuber sleek designs and many of these consoles have their own distinct sound either. That uniqueness of Nintendo is still there. Nintendo still reigns supreme.
@technotreegrass Nah bruh Outside of the marketing campaigns on TV, there WAS Nintendo/Sega console war stuff on the playground and it was brutal. Does matter if you owned a SNES or a Genesis, Snes had great games. Sega acknowledged it. Skip ahead to the N64/PS1 years...yeah...that's when crap got less brutal . I N64, N64 is a Men’s console." It ain’t a baby’s console.
@Wavey84 There was definitely real console wars on playgrounds during the NES/Master System generation and SNES/Genesis days....Nobody enjoyed both consoles.....The evil Sega empire was defeated by the heroic Nintendo kingdom.. I would too easily give the 16-bit crown to the SNES.
The PS1/N64 generation? There was def a console wars, it wasn’t more prominent than the generation before it. It WAS until the gamecube generation when console wars got a little more serious. It's when Nintendo wrongly so got deemed 'kiddy' even though they aren’t kiddy.
@Audiobrainiac If you actually use that with no regrets you need help.
@Red-force Blast processing is a horrible marketing gimmick and sega era the not the most golden game ever. You don’t have experience.
@Splatburst There WAS a console war and it was NOT just a US thing.